|
Final Paper Refereeing The 'rules' for reviewing the final paper follow those for reviewing the rough draft (again, adapted from guidelines from Dr. Dan Robey, Georgia State University; They are repeated here to save you the effort of having to go back to the rough draft reviewing site). There is one additional rating area: Referee Recommendations. This is quite common when reviewing papers for a journal: You are to make a suggestion to the editor regarding the feasibility of publishing the paper in the journal. As always, Each paper will be assigned two referees. Each referee will be required to read the paper and evaluate it in the eight areas given below. Each area (Except for suggestions and recommendations to the editor) requires a rating on a 7 point scale as well as a 2-3 sentence critique. All submissions are to be made from the submissions page. {adapted from guidelines from Dr. Dan Robey, Georgia State University} A critique of a conceptual article examines the logic of the arguments made by the authors. Both strengths and weaknesses should be identified in a critique. Explain and justify each of your critique points in at least 2-3 sentences. Specific issues to address in a critique of a conceptual article include:
In addition to evaluating the paper based on the six areas above, there are two additional submissions to be made:
For Questions 1 through 6, Each referee will Rate each area using the following scale.
Very
Below Above Absolutely The referee Must submit their Reviews using the SUBMISSION FORM by the date given in the course schedule. This page was last updated on 01/20/04
|